Hmm. I'm conflicted about this. The initiative is laudable, of course; reducing waste and eliminating clutter is, I think, part of all our goals. But there's something about Bea's tone that rubs me the wrong way. It's probably a personality thing, but to me she comes across as cold, obsessive and judgemental. Just two examples of what I mean:
1. from page 2 the article: "“We don’t do everything right,” she says. “We do have garbage. We do fly overseas to see my family in France once a year.” Despite the regressions, the way the family lives makes others at least sit up and take notice..."
Wait. Did she just say travelling is wrong? Did she just call seeing a different part of the world a "regression"?! To me, that's horrifying. Travel is one of the experiences I value most in life; it's pretty much the only thing that truly opens one's mind to diversity, if you let it. Besides, isn't it slightly hypocritical to refrain from experiencing the world you're trying to protect from waste?! If living in one place, with your head in the sand, is the way of the future, then count me out.
2. Then I tried reading the blog, starting with the oldest entries. In the second entry, "a Zero Waste Chrismas or almost..." I found this next gem: "my personal favorite present this year came from my husband who gave me coupons for dinners out and undivided time with him (much needed for decluttering)."
The idea of giving "time together coupons" is something some people find charming. I'm not one of them, but to each their own. However, when your first thought for quality time with your husband is to use it for decluttering, that makes me pause. I guess what couples like to do together is their business, but to me that sentence speaks of obsession and a very cold personality.
I had to stop reading the blog because her tone throughout every entry made me angry. Not sure if I'm particularly irritable today (don't think so...), but while I admire the idea, I had a visceral reaction to her writing.
Sorry about the rant...