<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask Unclutterer: Trash or treasure old stuffed animals?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60466</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@J in the UK -- Please re-read the post you linked to of mine, as well as Colin&#039;s book. You&#039;ll see in both that environmentalism is Colin&#039;s path to a remarkable life (not his goal), and also that environmentalism is not my path. You&#039;ll also see that his definition of a remarkable life has very little to do with saving the planet, and everything to do with saving himself and his family. (And, assuaging a great deal of his personal guilt.)

Additionally, re-read this post. You&#039;ll see that I gave Kay a lot of advice for what to do with her stuffed animals that doesn&#039;t involve putting them in the trash if they&#039;re in decent condition. Also, the numerous comments for other ways to recycle the plushies are fantastic. But, if it turns out these stuffed animals are in really bad shape, I continue to support her putting trash in the trash. That&#039;s not going to change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J in the UK &#8212; Please re-read the post you linked to of mine, as well as Colin&#8217;s book. You&#8217;ll see in both that environmentalism is Colin&#8217;s path to a remarkable life (not his goal), and also that environmentalism is not my path. You&#8217;ll also see that his definition of a remarkable life has very little to do with saving the planet, and everything to do with saving himself and his family. (And, assuaging a great deal of his personal guilt.)</p>
<p>Additionally, re-read this post. You&#8217;ll see that I gave Kay a lot of advice for what to do with her stuffed animals that doesn&#8217;t involve putting them in the trash if they&#8217;re in decent condition. Also, the numerous comments for other ways to recycle the plushies are fantastic. But, if it turns out these stuffed animals are in really bad shape, I continue to support her putting trash in the trash. That&#8217;s not going to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J in the UK</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60461</link>
		<dc:creator>J in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are not an environmentalist, but you do claim that your &#039;remarkable goal&#039; is somehow similar to that of no impact man - and quite recently http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/03/many-paths-can-lead-to-the-same-remarkable-goal/

This post, and your reaction to my comments, suggest that not only are you on an entirely different path, but that the goal is in a completely different place.

The original Q came from someone who has a few cardboard box too many of plush toys.  No suggestion of a problem of &#039;life of grime&#039; proportions. Most of what we call &#039;trash&#039; has value, just not to us at that moment.  It only becomes trash when mix it up with a whole lot of other stuff (e.g. in the wastestream and landfill) so that it loses its value (waste is a verb, not a noun).

I can&#039;t do better than the many other commentators here:

Freecycle, craigs list, charity shops (for resale and recycling), specific charities (women&#039;s aid, animal rescue shelters), repurpose as art.  All great suggestions.  All better suggestions than turning something that has inherent value (either in itself or in its materials) into trash.

That doesn&#039;t mean that someone shouldn&#039;t get rid of &quot;clutter&quot; - just to be more mindful about how they do so, so as to turn clutter into something useful again.  Throwing it &quot;away&quot; doesn&#039;t stop something being clutter - it just means the clutter from your house is now clutter in landfill or clutter in the ocean or clutter in a big pile on another continent.  Simpler living, yeah maybe (but look at all the enormous amount of NEW STUFF we supposedly need to buy in order to live simply!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not an environmentalist, but you do claim that your &#8216;remarkable goal&#8217; is somehow similar to that of no impact man &#8211; and quite recently <a href="http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/03/many-paths-can-lead-to-the-same-remarkable-goal/" rel="nofollow">http://unclutterer.com/2010/08.....able-goal/</a></p>
<p>This post, and your reaction to my comments, suggest that not only are you on an entirely different path, but that the goal is in a completely different place.</p>
<p>The original Q came from someone who has a few cardboard box too many of plush toys.  No suggestion of a problem of &#8216;life of grime&#8217; proportions. Most of what we call &#8216;trash&#8217; has value, just not to us at that moment.  It only becomes trash when mix it up with a whole lot of other stuff (e.g. in the wastestream and landfill) so that it loses its value (waste is a verb, not a noun).</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t do better than the many other commentators here:</p>
<p>Freecycle, craigs list, charity shops (for resale and recycling), specific charities (women&#8217;s aid, animal rescue shelters), repurpose as art.  All great suggestions.  All better suggestions than turning something that has inherent value (either in itself or in its materials) into trash.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean that someone shouldn&#8217;t get rid of &#8220;clutter&#8221; &#8211; just to be more mindful about how they do so, so as to turn clutter into something useful again.  Throwing it &#8220;away&#8221; doesn&#8217;t stop something being clutter &#8211; it just means the clutter from your house is now clutter in landfill or clutter in the ocean or clutter in a big pile on another continent.  Simpler living, yeah maybe (but look at all the enormous amount of NEW STUFF we supposedly need to buy in order to live simply!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fern</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60460</link>
		<dc:creator>Fern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of people have replied to my comments about recycling worn-out clothes.

Whoever said that it&#039;s a good idea to mark clothes for recycling as such is absolutely right. It saves a lot of time, especially if there&#039;s bags and bags!

As for upholstered furniture, a lot of the time that can&#039;t be taken because of health and safety, more specifically it not fitting with fire safety regulations. The laws have changed and a LOT of old furniture doesn&#039;t fit them so it can&#039;t be resold. That&#039;s also why it&#039;s difficult to get rid of old beds - unless they&#039;re new enough to be marked as complying with the latest regulations, it&#039;s probably far easier to have them pulped down or something rather than find out if they comply (and they probably don&#039;t).

I agree that some things belong in the trash, but there&#039;s a difference between used toilet paper and a cuddly toy. If it&#039;s good enough to donate, donate it (possibly after cleaning it). If it&#039;s too shabby but can be recycled, find somewhere that will recycle it. Only if you can&#039;t recycle it and it&#039;s really too bad to be played with again should it be trashed. The bin is for rubbish, not things you can&#039;t be bothered to deal with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of people have replied to my comments about recycling worn-out clothes.</p>
<p>Whoever said that it&#8217;s a good idea to mark clothes for recycling as such is absolutely right. It saves a lot of time, especially if there&#8217;s bags and bags!</p>
<p>As for upholstered furniture, a lot of the time that can&#8217;t be taken because of health and safety, more specifically it not fitting with fire safety regulations. The laws have changed and a LOT of old furniture doesn&#8217;t fit them so it can&#8217;t be resold. That&#8217;s also why it&#8217;s difficult to get rid of old beds &#8211; unless they&#8217;re new enough to be marked as complying with the latest regulations, it&#8217;s probably far easier to have them pulped down or something rather than find out if they comply (and they probably don&#8217;t).</p>
<p>I agree that some things belong in the trash, but there&#8217;s a difference between used toilet paper and a cuddly toy. If it&#8217;s good enough to donate, donate it (possibly after cleaning it). If it&#8217;s too shabby but can be recycled, find somewhere that will recycle it. Only if you can&#8217;t recycle it and it&#8217;s really too bad to be played with again should it be trashed. The bin is for rubbish, not things you can&#8217;t be bothered to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60459</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@J in the UK -- I am not an environmentalist. I have never claimed to be, nor do I imagine I will ever claim to be. It is impossible to be alive and NOT impact the environment. The mere act of breathing, eating, walking, etc. impacts the world.

Your comments are written from the perspective of someone who probably already lives relatively simply and who has a low attachment to physical objects. However, not all of our readers are in the same position as you are. A great majority of our readers have homes stuffed, where damage has been done to objects in their storage spaces. Additionally, some readers will hold onto an object until they find the &quot;perfect&quot; home for it, which might never happen.

I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s virtuous to throw something away, but trash belongs in the trash. Watch an episode of hoarders where shovels are used to scrape up clutter from the floor -- this stuff does NOT belong at Goodwill.

You are welcome to disagree with me, but if you do, you should offer up suggestions for recycling the materials beyond just complaining about my trash suggestion. Passing judgment on me does not help out anyone else to come up with alternate ideas. The purpose of the posts and comments on this site are to help people who have issues with parting with their clutter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J in the UK &#8212; I am not an environmentalist. I have never claimed to be, nor do I imagine I will ever claim to be. It is impossible to be alive and NOT impact the environment. The mere act of breathing, eating, walking, etc. impacts the world.</p>
<p>Your comments are written from the perspective of someone who probably already lives relatively simply and who has a low attachment to physical objects. However, not all of our readers are in the same position as you are. A great majority of our readers have homes stuffed, where damage has been done to objects in their storage spaces. Additionally, some readers will hold onto an object until they find the &#8220;perfect&#8221; home for it, which might never happen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s virtuous to throw something away, but trash belongs in the trash. Watch an episode of hoarders where shovels are used to scrape up clutter from the floor &#8212; this stuff does NOT belong at Goodwill.</p>
<p>You are welcome to disagree with me, but if you do, you should offer up suggestions for recycling the materials beyond just complaining about my trash suggestion. Passing judgment on me does not help out anyone else to come up with alternate ideas. The purpose of the posts and comments on this site are to help people who have issues with parting with their clutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J in the UK</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60458</link>
		<dc:creator>J in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then you need a realistic assessment of how unhealthy a toy actually is after cleaning.  Not sure that allusion to small pox deaths facilitates this realistic assessment (given that small pox has now been eradicated and all).  What is the risk of a child getting sick from these items (post-cleaning)?

Making a virtue out of wasting stuff (and making people feel good about doing so &quot;giving ourselves permission&quot; etc....) is the opposite of what no impact man and others are talking about - despite your desire to be seen as on the same page.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then you need a realistic assessment of how unhealthy a toy actually is after cleaning.  Not sure that allusion to small pox deaths facilitates this realistic assessment (given that small pox has now been eradicated and all).  What is the risk of a child getting sick from these items (post-cleaning)?</p>
<p>Making a virtue out of wasting stuff (and making people feel good about doing so &#8220;giving ourselves permission&#8221; etc&#8230;.) is the opposite of what no impact man and others are talking about &#8211; despite your desire to be seen as on the same page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60457</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a natural disaster some years back, older children in local schools brought in their old stuffed animals.  These were collected and brought to a benevolent local drycleaner who cleaned them all for free, to help out, and they were then included in packages that were put together to pass out to affected families.  Many of the recipients had lost all their toys, and they were very welcomed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a natural disaster some years back, older children in local schools brought in their old stuffed animals.  These were collected and brought to a benevolent local drycleaner who cleaned them all for free, to help out, and they were then included in packages that were put together to pass out to affected families.  Many of the recipients had lost all their toys, and they were very welcomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60456</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 04:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long time reader, but this time I had to come over and comment. I wholeheartedly agree with J in the UK. I think this post should be rewritten to include a lot of the commenters&#039; ideas. I was shocked to read that we should just put these types of items in the trash.  I have gone out of my way to find textile recycling for old unwearable clothing due to guilt over the landfills.  I would have assumed that you would be similarly inclined.  Part of my whole aim in decluttering (or never buying clutter in the first place) is to reduce my impact on the world.  I am really disappointed by this post, and hope that you may consider editing the main text to include other ideas. Some of us just read the main body of the post due to rss feed settings, and I would hate to train people who are decluttering that their first stop might be the trash.  Aside from this post, Erin, I really enjoy and appreciate your blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time reader, but this time I had to come over and comment. I wholeheartedly agree with J in the UK. I think this post should be rewritten to include a lot of the commenters&#8217; ideas. I was shocked to read that we should just put these types of items in the trash.  I have gone out of my way to find textile recycling for old unwearable clothing due to guilt over the landfills.  I would have assumed that you would be similarly inclined.  Part of my whole aim in decluttering (or never buying clutter in the first place) is to reduce my impact on the world.  I am really disappointed by this post, and hope that you may consider editing the main text to include other ideas. Some of us just read the main body of the post due to rss feed settings, and I would hate to train people who are decluttering that their first stop might be the trash.  Aside from this post, Erin, I really enjoy and appreciate your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foilhead1</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60455</link>
		<dc:creator>foilhead1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goodwill may accept them, but they will not resell them.  I have recently found this out.  My local one will not even accept them anymore.  I did find that many can be washed and fluffed, some just need vacuumed. 
A few years ago, a family friend who went crazy for those Webkins, would only buy them and play the games online and then give or throw away the stuffed animals. (ridiculous, I know). so my daughter asked if she could have them.  She brought home 4 large garbage bags full.  We hand picked about a dozen various animals for my grandson and the rest we gave away on Halloween that year.  They were brand new within a few months and had never been played with.  The kids were thrilled to get them.  We are in a small town, and were able explained to parents why we were giving them away.  We gave out hundreds that year!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodwill may accept them, but they will not resell them.  I have recently found this out.  My local one will not even accept them anymore.  I did find that many can be washed and fluffed, some just need vacuumed.<br />
A few years ago, a family friend who went crazy for those Webkins, would only buy them and play the games online and then give or throw away the stuffed animals. (ridiculous, I know). so my daughter asked if she could have them.  She brought home 4 large garbage bags full.  We hand picked about a dozen various animals for my grandson and the rest we gave away on Halloween that year.  They were brand new within a few months and had never been played with.  The kids were thrilled to get them.  We are in a small town, and were able explained to parents why we were giving them away.  We gave out hundreds that year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catastrophegirl</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60453</link>
		<dc:creator>catastrophegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;ve been told that sticking your stuffed animals in a large ziplock, squishing out the air and freezing them for two weeks can take care of dustmites. i haven&#039;t ever examined one microscopically to check afterwards but it might be worth a try if you can&#039;t steam clean them and have the freezer space]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been told that sticking your stuffed animals in a large ziplock, squishing out the air and freezing them for two weeks can take care of dustmites. i haven&#8217;t ever examined one microscopically to check afterwards but it might be worth a try if you can&#8217;t steam clean them and have the freezer space</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60452</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our church has a circulation day every spring.  It is like a giant garage or rummage sale except everything is free.  So if you get toys and clothes cleaned and they are too worn for charity (who seem to want nearly new stuff these days), consider it.  Someone may still want it.  It is always a HUGE success.  People pick up clothes and toys for their kids, books, furniture, etc.  Our priest approaches people who seem to be flea market people and offers to let them have what is left over rather than take the cream off the top.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our church has a circulation day every spring.  It is like a giant garage or rummage sale except everything is free.  So if you get toys and clothes cleaned and they are too worn for charity (who seem to want nearly new stuff these days), consider it.  Someone may still want it.  It is always a HUGE success.  People pick up clothes and toys for their kids, books, furniture, etc.  Our priest approaches people who seem to be flea market people and offers to let them have what is left over rather than take the cream off the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Huxham</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60451</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Huxham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking from childhood experience (which was, strange to say it, barely a decade ago), if you decide to wash your stuffed animals before &quot;uncluttering&quot; them, beware the dryer. If the animals have that thin, wispy, long hair that you can manipulate to make all sorts of hairstyles (manes on horses, crests on birds, tails on Chick-fil-A cows), do NOT stick them in the dryer after they are wet; the hair with mat together and you will never be able to untangle it—and you&#039;ll be left with a really silly-looking toy. Just sayin&#039;, &#039;cause a number of my childhood animals were ruined because of the dryer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking from childhood experience (which was, strange to say it, barely a decade ago), if you decide to wash your stuffed animals before &#8220;uncluttering&#8221; them, beware the dryer. If the animals have that thin, wispy, long hair that you can manipulate to make all sorts of hairstyles (manes on horses, crests on birds, tails on Chick-fil-A cows), do NOT stick them in the dryer after they are wet; the hair with mat together and you will never be able to untangle it—and you&#8217;ll be left with a really silly-looking toy. Just sayin&#8217;, &#8217;cause a number of my childhood animals were ruined because of the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60449</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Natalie

Exactly! Wash them and let someone else play with them. We create enough garbage as a species as it is. No need to create more waste if they can be donated to shelters, hospitals, schools, etc. (after washing, of course.) I am not a fan of uncluttering my home by overcluttering the landfill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Natalie</p>
<p>Exactly! Wash them and let someone else play with them. We create enough garbage as a species as it is. No need to create more waste if they can be donated to shelters, hospitals, schools, etc. (after washing, of course.) I am not a fan of uncluttering my home by overcluttering the landfill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60447</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@J in the UK -- I&#039;m all for reducing one&#039;s footprint and recycling when possible, but trash belongs in the trash. In fact, there are times when throwing something away can actually be better for the environment than recycling it. And, in this case, if the toys could make a child sick, the trash might also be the safest place for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J in the UK &#8212; I&#8217;m all for reducing one&#8217;s footprint and recycling when possible, but trash belongs in the trash. In fact, there are times when throwing something away can actually be better for the environment than recycling it. And, in this case, if the toys could make a child sick, the trash might also be the safest place for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Chase</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60446</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!  There are so many good suggestions, and I never would have thought of half of them (such as puppet theater &amp; other prop departments, or donating to the animal shelter, which is a *great* idea.)  And I have a friend who creates mad monster stuffies out of old ones -- I just didn&#039;t make the connection that she might be able to use my (steamed) old animals for her craft projects.  Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  There are so many good suggestions, and I never would have thought of half of them (such as puppet theater &amp; other prop departments, or donating to the animal shelter, which is a *great* idea.)  And I have a friend who creates mad monster stuffies out of old ones &#8212; I just didn&#8217;t make the connection that she might be able to use my (steamed) old animals for her craft projects.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2010/08/13/ask-unclutterer-trash-or-treasure-old-stuffed-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-60445</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=10006#comment-60445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tod -- I agree that an irrational fear of germs is, well, irrational. However, germs can travel in fabrics very easily, especially fabrics that have been stored in dark and damp locations (cardboard, basement) like this question asker admitted. 

Need I remind you about small pox deaths in the Native American community?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tod &#8212; I agree that an irrational fear of germs is, well, irrational. However, germs can travel in fabrics very easily, especially fabrics that have been stored in dark and damp locations (cardboard, basement) like this question asker admitted. </p>
<p>Need I remind you about small pox deaths in the Native American community?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 424/426 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: unclutterer.com @ 2013-05-18 22:03:34 by W3 Total Cache -->