<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preserving digitized photographs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:42:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lilli</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-49811</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-49811</guid>
		<description>I agree with all of your wonderful suggestions and have used Scan Cafe to scan in all of my old hard copies. The only thing is, I hate the look and feel of digital photo albums. Feels corporate, not homey. There is nothing better than an old photo album with black paper pages, filled with small black &amp; white (or color) square photos, with a white border and jagged edges.

For storage, digital photos is the way to go.
For enjoyment, I prefer the old-school prints.

Does anyone know of a service that will PRINT OUT (and/or use already existing prints) photos and then create a photo album with the prints?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all of your wonderful suggestions and have used Scan Cafe to scan in all of my old hard copies. The only thing is, I hate the look and feel of digital photo albums. Feels corporate, not homey. There is nothing better than an old photo album with black paper pages, filled with small black &amp; white (or color) square photos, with a white border and jagged edges.</p>
<p>For storage, digital photos is the way to go.<br />
For enjoyment, I prefer the old-school prints.</p>
<p>Does anyone know of a service that will PRINT OUT (and/or use already existing prints) photos and then create a photo album with the prints?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inki</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-49701</link>
		<dc:creator>Inki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-49701</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know if anyone is still following this thread, but I recently started on a new Blurb book and noticed that the new version does have the ability for you to change the size and location of elements on the page - love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if anyone is still following this thread, but I recently started on a new Blurb book and noticed that the new version does have the ability for you to change the size and location of elements on the page &#8211; love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-45728</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-45728</guid>
		<description>I used www.briteroots.com to scan all my pics last year.  They were very quick and easy to use.  Also, I was happy to have all my images stored online for free.  I think they are currently only 10 cents per photo right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used <a href="http://www.briteroots.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.briteroots.com</a> to scan all my pics last year.  They were very quick and easy to use.  Also, I was happy to have all my images stored online for free.  I think they are currently only 10 cents per photo right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Cagey Bee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ahhhhhhhhh!</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-42168</link>
		<dc:creator>A Cagey Bee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ahhhhhhhhh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-42168</guid>
		<description>[...] - I always find good tips here &amp; have several [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; I always find good tips here &amp; have several [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-32587</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-32587</guid>
		<description>Great idea! I used a company called iPreserve. 

-They came to me to pick up and deliver my originals and newly digitized copies.

-Their prices are very good for such a personal service.

-I was extremely pleased with the final product.

Check them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! I used a company called iPreserve. </p>
<p>-They came to me to pick up and deliver my originals and newly digitized copies.</p>
<p>-Their prices are very good for such a personal service.</p>
<p>-I was extremely pleased with the final product.</p>
<p>Check them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m an Organizing Junkie &#187; Link~Tastic - The Picture/Keepsake Edition</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-30888</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m an Organizing Junkie &#187; Link~Tastic - The Picture/Keepsake Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-30888</guid>
		<description>[...] Preserving Digitized Photographs ~ @ Unclutterer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Preserving Digitized Photographs ~ @ Unclutterer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-28518</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-28518</guid>
		<description>I love Picasa, but I haven&#039;t found it entirely useful for organizing photos the way I want. I understand iPhoto is similar in that it sorts based on dates or folder names, but you can create your own method of sorting within the program. If anyone knows a method or program that allows that, I&#039;d love to hear about it.

I read about (and can&#039;t find the link now) a website where you can mail in your old photographs and they&#039;ll make matching, hardcover albums from high quality scans. They send you the books and the originals back. Might be a time saver if you have loads of photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Picasa, but I haven&#8217;t found it entirely useful for organizing photos the way I want. I understand iPhoto is similar in that it sorts based on dates or folder names, but you can create your own method of sorting within the program. If anyone knows a method or program that allows that, I&#8217;d love to hear about it.</p>
<p>I read about (and can&#8217;t find the link now) a website where you can mail in your old photographs and they&#8217;ll make matching, hardcover albums from high quality scans. They send you the books and the originals back. Might be a time saver if you have loads of photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny (usagi)</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-27468</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny (usagi)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27468</guid>
		<description>Talk about perfect timing! I&#039;m just beginning the scanning of four large boxes of photos. So far I&#039;ve been happy with speed/quality of using my Fujitsu SnapScan to do the photo scanning. I scan 10 photos at a time with the lowest compression and highest quality settings. At some point I&#039;ll export them from the pdfs to tiffs and organize, but that is probably a project for the far distant future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about perfect timing! I&#8217;m just beginning the scanning of four large boxes of photos. So far I&#8217;ve been happy with speed/quality of using my Fujitsu SnapScan to do the photo scanning. I scan 10 photos at a time with the lowest compression and highest quality settings. At some point I&#8217;ll export them from the pdfs to tiffs and organize, but that is probably a project for the far distant future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-27460</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27460</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on setting my goal to hv all my photos &amp; transparencies scanned in 2009. In this comment I&#039;m addressing one point, the preservation of all those files we create. I&#039;ve subscribed to Mozy for backup. Regardless that I work for EMC, Mozy&#039;s part of the &quot;Cloud&quot; division, the $5/mth for all u consume storage is a bargain. In 2008 I ripped all my CDs to FLAC as a gold copy - some 130GB, Mozy&#039;s got the lot. I know examples (non-EMCers) who hv used the recovery side of the service for real &amp; it worked without hitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on setting my goal to hv all my photos &amp; transparencies scanned in 2009. In this comment I&#8217;m addressing one point, the preservation of all those files we create. I&#8217;ve subscribed to Mozy for backup. Regardless that I work for EMC, Mozy&#8217;s part of the &#8220;Cloud&#8221; division, the $5/mth for all u consume storage is a bargain. In 2008 I ripped all my CDs to FLAC as a gold copy &#8211; some 130GB, Mozy&#8217;s got the lot. I know examples (non-EMCers) who hv used the recovery side of the service for real &amp; it worked without hitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-27426</link>
		<dc:creator>Candace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27426</guid>
		<description>Last year I used DigMyPics.com to convert all of my hard photos and negatives to digital format. I was very impressed with their service and would highly recommend their company. Now I store all of my documents, music, and photos on Flipdrive as a safeguard if my computer dies. Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year I used DigMyPics.com to convert all of my hard photos and negatives to digital format. I was very impressed with their service and would highly recommend their company. Now I store all of my documents, music, and photos on Flipdrive as a safeguard if my computer dies. Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Geeks and a Blog :: Geek News :: Quick Hits: Jan. 25 - 31</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-27390</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Geeks and a Blog :: Geek News :: Quick Hits: Jan. 25 - 31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27390</guid>
		<description>[...] Preserving digitized photos - Unclutterer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Preserving digitized photos &#8211; Unclutterer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-2/#comment-27159</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27159</guid>
		<description>To sum up what has been mentioned here:  All photos are not equal.  Vacation photos of scenery are not in the same category as your wedding photos.  You don&#039;t have to handle all photos the same.  If you absolutely love it, keep it on paper, AND, up load it, AND put it on CD AND keep another paper copy at a relatives, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To sum up what has been mentioned here:  All photos are not equal.  Vacation photos of scenery are not in the same category as your wedding photos.  You don&#8217;t have to handle all photos the same.  If you absolutely love it, keep it on paper, AND, up load it, AND put it on CD AND keep another paper copy at a relatives, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27129</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27129</guid>
		<description>One word of warning to jump from iPhoto to Aperture 2 - I attempted to make that jump recently, and it didn&#039;t take, at all.  While I&#039;m sure that with the proper time investment in going through tutorials I would&#039;ve gotten the hang of it, but I underestimated how frustrating it&#039;d be to be dealing with my ongoing photo management with a tool that I didn&#039;t understand at all how to use.

Yesterday I picked up the new iLife &#039;09, and have so far been really enjoying iPhoto, training it whose faces are whose, in turn rediscovering photographs I didn&#039;t even realize I had.

My free trial with Aperture is almost up, and I&#039;ll just let that expire.  The only reason I could think of using Aperture in tandem with iPhoto (something I considered doing) would be because of its ability to customize or create layouts for photo books.  That&#039;s not worth $200 to me, though.  I&#039;d prefer that iPhoto work with Pages in iWork for that, personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word of warning to jump from iPhoto to Aperture 2 &#8211; I attempted to make that jump recently, and it didn&#8217;t take, at all.  While I&#8217;m sure that with the proper time investment in going through tutorials I would&#8217;ve gotten the hang of it, but I underestimated how frustrating it&#8217;d be to be dealing with my ongoing photo management with a tool that I didn&#8217;t understand at all how to use.</p>
<p>Yesterday I picked up the new iLife &#8216;09, and have so far been really enjoying iPhoto, training it whose faces are whose, in turn rediscovering photographs I didn&#8217;t even realize I had.</p>
<p>My free trial with Aperture is almost up, and I&#8217;ll just let that expire.  The only reason I could think of using Aperture in tandem with iPhoto (something I considered doing) would be because of its ability to customize or create layouts for photo books.  That&#8217;s not worth $200 to me, though.  I&#8217;d prefer that iPhoto work with Pages in iWork for that, personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bump</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27110</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27110</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll echo the recommendation for Lightroom (PC &amp; Mac; no Linux, sadly).  It is very flexible as an image cataloger, and also very easy to use for image manipulation, whether simple or complex.  I think having both functions in one package is indispensable.

I&#039;ll also echo the recommendation of using hard disk instead of CD/DVD for your archive media--onsite, offsite, anysite.  You know you will need to migrate all of that data to new media to keep it accessible; the only question is when.  Do you really want to manually load all of those DVDs into an optical drive, one by one and wait for each to copy?  The same pain applies to the initial archiving process, which is then more likely to be postponed.  The easier and faster backups are to perform, the more likely they are to get done regularly.

I think online backup has potential, but currently I&#039;d treat it as an expensive last resort.  The upload rate on my cable broadband is not that much greater than my capture rate, in raw format.  And a full disaster recovery would take a long, long time, even at high-speed download rates.  It may be more feasible if you only have jpeg images.  

It&#039;s also interesting that most of us (self included) are considering trading physical clutter of analog film for digital clutter of scanned images, which can be just as overwhelming, and in many ways much easier to screw up.  I love the articles on reducing physical clutter, but I&#039;m definitely interested in more focus on avoiding and reducing digital clutter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll echo the recommendation for Lightroom (PC &amp; Mac; no Linux, sadly).  It is very flexible as an image cataloger, and also very easy to use for image manipulation, whether simple or complex.  I think having both functions in one package is indispensable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also echo the recommendation of using hard disk instead of CD/DVD for your archive media&#8211;onsite, offsite, anysite.  You know you will need to migrate all of that data to new media to keep it accessible; the only question is when.  Do you really want to manually load all of those DVDs into an optical drive, one by one and wait for each to copy?  The same pain applies to the initial archiving process, which is then more likely to be postponed.  The easier and faster backups are to perform, the more likely they are to get done regularly.</p>
<p>I think online backup has potential, but currently I&#8217;d treat it as an expensive last resort.  The upload rate on my cable broadband is not that much greater than my capture rate, in raw format.  And a full disaster recovery would take a long, long time, even at high-speed download rates.  It may be more feasible if you only have jpeg images.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting that most of us (self included) are considering trading physical clutter of analog film for digital clutter of scanned images, which can be just as overwhelming, and in many ways much easier to screw up.  I love the articles on reducing physical clutter, but I&#8217;m definitely interested in more focus on avoiding and reducing digital clutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27099</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27099</guid>
		<description>Another place to design your own hardcover books from your photographs is heritage makers.  You completely control the design and can upload your own designs from other software or use their system to design your books.  

They will also backup your photos for you once they are uploaded to their website and their design software is through a web browser - no extra software to download</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another place to design your own hardcover books from your photographs is heritage makers.  You completely control the design and can upload your own designs from other software or use their system to design your books.  </p>
<p>They will also backup your photos for you once they are uploaded to their website and their design software is through a web browser &#8211; no extra software to download</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryll</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27082</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27082</guid>
		<description>I was interested in saving photos, especially years of slides, until I did the math.  A photo on good quality photo paper will easily last 50 years, and often 100, if stored properly. slides aren&#039;t good for more than about 20, I have discovered. 

Digital media (laser read) will be easily readable for maybe 2 years, and at max, with retro equipment, 10.  so this whole project will need to be repeated every couple times the software/hardware is upgraded.

I just don&#039;t want to be messing with them so often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interested in saving photos, especially years of slides, until I did the math.  A photo on good quality photo paper will easily last 50 years, and often 100, if stored properly. slides aren&#8217;t good for more than about 20, I have discovered. </p>
<p>Digital media (laser read) will be easily readable for maybe 2 years, and at max, with retro equipment, 10.  so this whole project will need to be repeated every couple times the software/hardware is upgraded.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t want to be messing with them so often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27079</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27079</guid>
		<description>@midlifemom -- Many people have similar concerns. Check with your local camera shop to see if they offer a local solution. Also, you could do it yourself with a nice photo scanner or one borrowed from a friend. The way I&#039;m justifying sending mine off through the mail is that my house could burn down ... and if it did, all of my pictures would be destroyed. I&#039;m taking the same risk by NOT having them scanned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@midlifemom &#8212; Many people have similar concerns. Check with your local camera shop to see if they offer a local solution. Also, you could do it yourself with a nice photo scanner or one borrowed from a friend. The way I&#8217;m justifying sending mine off through the mail is that my house could burn down &#8230; and if it did, all of my pictures would be destroyed. I&#8217;m taking the same risk by NOT having them scanned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midlifemom</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27078</link>
		<dc:creator>midlifemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27078</guid>
		<description>One more thought...what about the issue of sending the photos away.  I have not tried any of these scanning services because I am so worried that my only copy of my photos will get lost or destroyed after leaving my protective control.  Just wondering what others think of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thought&#8230;what about the issue of sending the photos away.  I have not tried any of these scanning services because I am so worried that my only copy of my photos will get lost or destroyed after leaving my protective control.  Just wondering what others think of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midlifemom</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27070</link>
		<dc:creator>midlifemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27070</guid>
		<description>For photo books take a look at Mpix.com.  Their templates are amazingly flexible.  You can even rotate the picture holders.  Their professional series of print paper is amazing, but not inexpensive.  I tested it out by ordering a print from kodak and one from mpix and the color difference was stunning.  I have not seen their bound photo books yet. but, I have it on an avid photographer&#039;s advice that the quality is great.  I am working on a book and am looking forward to seeing the final copy. I also have used Blurb and My Publisher and thought Blurb was superior to My Publisher, but the Mpix software is the best, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For photo books take a look at Mpix.com.  Their templates are amazingly flexible.  You can even rotate the picture holders.  Their professional series of print paper is amazing, but not inexpensive.  I tested it out by ordering a print from kodak and one from mpix and the color difference was stunning.  I have not seen their bound photo books yet. but, I have it on an avid photographer&#8217;s advice that the quality is great.  I am working on a book and am looking forward to seeing the final copy. I also have used Blurb and My Publisher and thought Blurb was superior to My Publisher, but the Mpix software is the best, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Deb</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2009/01/26/preserving-digitized-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-27067</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=3960#comment-27067</guid>
		<description>Thank you all for the amazing amount of information you all have posted here.  I am a year or so into a family tree project, scanning prints and slides with my Epson 4990 Photo scanner(same as Laura&#039;s?).  I have thousands more slides and thousands more prints to scan and the task seems to just expand endlessly.  on top of it all, I have been taking slides for 20 years as references for my science classes.

This post answered a few dozen questions that have dogged me, such as the reliability of CD&#039;s(thanks Terry), what kinds of files to save (jpegs, whew!) and at what resolution, what to do with the old prints, what online services to upload to and who to use for printing albums.  I have been thinking about getting a portable hard drive and Mark Moline&#039;s storage and naming format has been very helpful.  Thanks OogieM for the book title that could really benefit my efforts.

By the way Mark, my own German horse picture is a treasure, since it is being held by my great-grandfather in front of the family brewery about 1900!

Are any of the online sites better for photos that the whole family can access?  What&#039;s shelf-life of an online photo-storage site in today&#039;s economy?  Anyone nervous that a Flickr-type company might fold unexpectedly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for the amazing amount of information you all have posted here.  I am a year or so into a family tree project, scanning prints and slides with my Epson 4990 Photo scanner(same as Laura&#8217;s?).  I have thousands more slides and thousands more prints to scan and the task seems to just expand endlessly.  on top of it all, I have been taking slides for 20 years as references for my science classes.</p>
<p>This post answered a few dozen questions that have dogged me, such as the reliability of CD&#8217;s(thanks Terry), what kinds of files to save (jpegs, whew!) and at what resolution, what to do with the old prints, what online services to upload to and who to use for printing albums.  I have been thinking about getting a portable hard drive and Mark Moline&#8217;s storage and naming format has been very helpful.  Thanks OogieM for the book title that could really benefit my efforts.</p>
<p>By the way Mark, my own German horse picture is a treasure, since it is being held by my great-grandfather in front of the family brewery about 1900!</p>
<p>Are any of the online sites better for photos that the whole family can access?  What&#8217;s shelf-life of an online photo-storage site in today&#8217;s economy?  Anyone nervous that a Flickr-type company might fold unexpectedly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
