<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detox your inbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:04:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CJW</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-28830</link>
		<dc:creator>CJW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 01:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-28830</guid>
		<description>I like the &quot;detox&quot; the inbox line. I can use any inbox tips so keep them coming! A tip for you in exchange is Outlook Track-It. It&#039;s a plugin/addon for outlook that lets you flag emails for followups. So, in case you have a bad memory (like me), this will remind you automatically. Google it for the website. I believe a trial download is on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the &#8220;detox&#8221; the inbox line. I can use any inbox tips so keep them coming! A tip for you in exchange is Outlook Track-It. It&#8217;s a plugin/addon for outlook that lets you flag emails for followups. So, in case you have a bad memory (like me), this will remind you automatically. Google it for the website. I believe a trial download is on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Halagarda</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19138</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Halagarda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19138</guid>
		<description>@Andamom - I agree and I often need to reference emails frequently but I don&#039;t use my inbox to manage them.  If interested, try researching a desktop search engine, compatible with your email system, that allows you to preview and perform actions directly. It has helped me personally, as well as my clients, to find what we need when we need it.

As with paper, there are emails that are action-related, reference and archive (i.e. cya) and they require separate systems for managing them.

@Andy - It sounds like you have a system that works for you and I don&#039;t recommend fixing what isn&#039;t broken.  Folders do require review and for many, this doesn&#039;t work.  I teach my clients to use an electronic task program or a paper-based planning system to manage to-do&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andamom &#8211; I agree and I often need to reference emails frequently but I don&#8217;t use my inbox to manage them.  If interested, try researching a desktop search engine, compatible with your email system, that allows you to preview and perform actions directly. It has helped me personally, as well as my clients, to find what we need when we need it.</p>
<p>As with paper, there are emails that are action-related, reference and archive (i.e. cya) and they require separate systems for managing them.</p>
<p>@Andy &#8211; It sounds like you have a system that works for you and I don&#8217;t recommend fixing what isn&#8217;t broken.  Folders do require review and for many, this doesn&#8217;t work.  I teach my clients to use an electronic task program or a paper-based planning system to manage to-do&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael@ Awareness * Connection</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19132</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael@ Awareness * Connection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19132</guid>
		<description>Mr. Mann borrows things from just about everywhere and credits only some of them. So going after this author, if you&#039;re being consistent, would mean you need to have a talk with Merlin too. And it would continue up the food chain from there since some of the thinkers/writers that Merlin Mann borrows from do the same thing.

I think bloggers could do a better job of at least dropping names here and there of who influenced our ideas. Not just to credit those who had them, but to leave a breadcrumb trail so that others can find their way around the web of ideas more easily.

But borrowing and synthesizing ideas without crediting them seems to an increasingly accepted standard practice. I&#039;d prefer ideas were credited more often, but I&#039;m old enough to realize that my preferences don&#039;t have a whole lot to do with how the world actually works. 

Also this Inbox Zero sort of concept has been around in enough forms that it is approaching a kind of public domain status. I did see one blogger over on ThinkSimpleNow flagrantly plagiarize a writer where the ideas were clearly in precisely the same format as the appeared  in the author&#039;s book...so there is still some boundary fortunately. This eventually got corrected after the author stumbled across the blog and pointed out the use of his work without credit.

Anyway, no matter how you slice it these were ideas worth sharing again. Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Mann borrows things from just about everywhere and credits only some of them. So going after this author, if you&#8217;re being consistent, would mean you need to have a talk with Merlin too. And it would continue up the food chain from there since some of the thinkers/writers that Merlin Mann borrows from do the same thing.</p>
<p>I think bloggers could do a better job of at least dropping names here and there of who influenced our ideas. Not just to credit those who had them, but to leave a breadcrumb trail so that others can find their way around the web of ideas more easily.</p>
<p>But borrowing and synthesizing ideas without crediting them seems to an increasingly accepted standard practice. I&#8217;d prefer ideas were credited more often, but I&#8217;m old enough to realize that my preferences don&#8217;t have a whole lot to do with how the world actually works. </p>
<p>Also this Inbox Zero sort of concept has been around in enough forms that it is approaching a kind of public domain status. I did see one blogger over on ThinkSimpleNow flagrantly plagiarize a writer where the ideas were clearly in precisely the same format as the appeared  in the author&#8217;s book&#8230;so there is still some boundary fortunately. This eventually got corrected after the author stumbled across the blog and pointed out the use of his work without credit.</p>
<p>Anyway, no matter how you slice it these were ideas worth sharing again. Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19115</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19115</guid>
		<description>@Josie -- Had she lifted their ideas, then sure, I&#039;d agree with you. But she didn&#039;t. There is a difference between plagiarism (which this isn&#039;t) and building on others&#039; ideas or just ideas that exist in the ether.

For example, in your statement just now, you say that we should &quot;try to do better next time.&quot; You aren&#039;t the first person to utter those words, yet you don&#039;t give credit to the millions of people who have said it before you. Do a Google search, with that exact phrase, and you&#039;ll pull up so many pages of responses that our comment box wouldn&#039;t even let you enter all of the sources if you wanted to.

No offense to Merlin, but his idea was less than revolutionary seeing as I (and millions of others) was keeping an empty inbox for years before I read his Inbox Zero document. In fact, I&#039;ve been using &quot;Mailbox Zero&quot; for more than 20 years to keep junk mail out of my house. There is nothing unique about his idea except for the name he attached to it. More importantly, the name of Merlin&#039;s site is 43 Folders -- a direct reference to Allen&#039;s Getting Things Done system -- but it doesn&#039;t explicitly say &quot;I borrowed the name of this website from a concept introduced in David Allen&#039;s book&quot; on the banner of his website. For Lauren to come to a similar conclusion on her own about keeping an inbox free of incoming e-mails is not surprising seeing as she has been a professional organizer working in people&#039;s offices for years before Merlin Mann even read David Allen&#039;s book.

I have a journalism degree, sat through hours of ethics training, worked for many publications, have a masters degree in English education, and taught classes on plagiarism ... NOTHING about Lauren&#039;s post violates any laws, or even walks a close line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josie &#8212; Had she lifted their ideas, then sure, I&#8217;d agree with you. But she didn&#8217;t. There is a difference between plagiarism (which this isn&#8217;t) and building on others&#8217; ideas or just ideas that exist in the ether.</p>
<p>For example, in your statement just now, you say that we should &#8220;try to do better next time.&#8221; You aren&#8217;t the first person to utter those words, yet you don&#8217;t give credit to the millions of people who have said it before you. Do a Google search, with that exact phrase, and you&#8217;ll pull up so many pages of responses that our comment box wouldn&#8217;t even let you enter all of the sources if you wanted to.</p>
<p>No offense to Merlin, but his idea was less than revolutionary seeing as I (and millions of others) was keeping an empty inbox for years before I read his Inbox Zero document. In fact, I&#8217;ve been using &#8220;Mailbox Zero&#8221; for more than 20 years to keep junk mail out of my house. There is nothing unique about his idea except for the name he attached to it. More importantly, the name of Merlin&#8217;s site is 43 Folders &#8212; a direct reference to Allen&#8217;s Getting Things Done system &#8212; but it doesn&#8217;t explicitly say &#8220;I borrowed the name of this website from a concept introduced in David Allen&#8217;s book&#8221; on the banner of his website. For Lauren to come to a similar conclusion on her own about keeping an inbox free of incoming e-mails is not surprising seeing as she has been a professional organizer working in people&#8217;s offices for years before Merlin Mann even read David Allen&#8217;s book.</p>
<p>I have a journalism degree, sat through hours of ethics training, worked for many publications, have a masters degree in English education, and taught classes on plagiarism &#8230; NOTHING about Lauren&#8217;s post violates any laws, or even walks a close line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19114</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19114</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Ben.  Credit where credit is due.  Even scientists have a strict code of crediting sources of related work and work they are building on.  

I think it&#039;s great to hear everyone&#039;s different spin on old ideas.  And this is a great set of ideas that is really relevant to Unclutterer.  But the post could have done a better job of crediting related ideas like Morgenstern and Mann.  

This is not meant to be &quot;shame on you&quot;, just &quot;try to do better next time&quot;.  We all can do better on this front in the blogesphere.  Thanks, and keep the great ideas coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Ben.  Credit where credit is due.  Even scientists have a strict code of crediting sources of related work and work they are building on.  </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s great to hear everyone&#8217;s different spin on old ideas.  And this is a great set of ideas that is really relevant to Unclutterer.  But the post could have done a better job of crediting related ideas like Morgenstern and Mann.  </p>
<p>This is not meant to be &#8220;shame on you&#8221;, just &#8220;try to do better next time&#8221;.  We all can do better on this front in the blogesphere.  Thanks, and keep the great ideas coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsypacker</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19103</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsypacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19103</guid>
		<description>I access twice a day, at the start of the day and mid-day.  I delete anything I can.  Ongoing problems have their own files, classes have theirs.  Anything else stays for a week at the most.  If it isn&#039;t handled in a week, then it qualifies as a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I access twice a day, at the start of the day and mid-day.  I delete anything I can.  Ongoing problems have their own files, classes have theirs.  Anything else stays for a week at the most.  If it isn&#8217;t handled in a week, then it qualifies as a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19098</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19098</guid>
		<description>Hi. Great post. Also sounds like an email-specific simplified version of GTD. 

Rather than a single Processing folder, I go one step further and seperate out &quot;Action&quot; and &quot;Review&quot; into two folders. It allows me to seperate out things I need to do from things I need to review so I can take care of different stuff depending on my mood. 

Before that I tried using the Outlook GTD plugin, but it didn&#039;t meet my needs for some reason. Maybe I needed something that didn&#039;t feel like it got in my way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Great post. Also sounds like an email-specific simplified version of GTD. </p>
<p>Rather than a single Processing folder, I go one step further and seperate out &#8220;Action&#8221; and &#8220;Review&#8221; into two folders. It allows me to seperate out things I need to do from things I need to review so I can take care of different stuff depending on my mood. </p>
<p>Before that I tried using the Outlook GTD plugin, but it didn&#8217;t meet my needs for some reason. Maybe I needed something that didn&#8217;t feel like it got in my way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19093</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19093</guid>
		<description>@Ben -- Your comment isn&#039;t clutter ... but Lauren wasn&#039;t stealing from Merlin Mann (I doubt she knows who he is). This idea was around long before Merlin wrote about it. The first time I saw someone mention something like it was Julie Morgenstern in 2004. Very few ideas, mine included, are wholly original. You hear something in passing, integrate it into your schema, put your spin on it, and advance the idea a little further. It&#039;s like scientists building on previous findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben &#8212; Your comment isn&#8217;t clutter &#8230; but Lauren wasn&#8217;t stealing from Merlin Mann (I doubt she knows who he is). This idea was around long before Merlin wrote about it. The first time I saw someone mention something like it was Julie Morgenstern in 2004. Very few ideas, mine included, are wholly original. You hear something in passing, integrate it into your schema, put your spin on it, and advance the idea a little further. It&#8217;s like scientists building on previous findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19092</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19092</guid>
		<description>I hope this comment isn&#039;t considered clutter:

These are not Lauren&#039;s ideas.  This is Merlin Mann&#039;s Inbox Zero.  I love Unclutterer and everything I&#039;ve seen so far is completely original and very useful.  I&#039;m surprised to see that there isn&#039;t even a reference to Mann&#039;s ideas in the article.  Credit where credit&#039;s due, Unclutterer.

Thanks, and I look forward to your next post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this comment isn&#8217;t considered clutter:</p>
<p>These are not Lauren&#8217;s ideas.  This is Merlin Mann&#8217;s Inbox Zero.  I love Unclutterer and everything I&#8217;ve seen so far is completely original and very useful.  I&#8217;m surprised to see that there isn&#8217;t even a reference to Mann&#8217;s ideas in the article.  Credit where credit&#8217;s due, Unclutterer.</p>
<p>Thanks, and I look forward to your next post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19089</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19089</guid>
		<description>I try to set up folders and drop the ones I DO need to keep into those; sometimes keeping an email has proven very useful at work.  (I had a co-worker who was fond at re-writing history, and the emails came in handy to verify decisions made in meetings.)

It is also a good idea to clear out your SPAM, JUNK and DELETED folders periodically, if your system doesn&#039;t do that automatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try to set up folders and drop the ones I DO need to keep into those; sometimes keeping an email has proven very useful at work.  (I had a co-worker who was fond at re-writing history, and the emails came in handy to verify decisions made in meetings.)</p>
<p>It is also a good idea to clear out your SPAM, JUNK and DELETED folders periodically, if your system doesn&#8217;t do that automatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19088</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19088</guid>
		<description>I admit it--I have emails from three or four years ago in my yahoo account. I use them as records of friendships, kind of like a journal. They don&#039;t take up space or anything (it&#039;s all online). 

So for this, I can&#039;t see the reason to declutter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit it&#8211;I have emails from three or four years ago in my yahoo account. I use them as records of friendships, kind of like a journal. They don&#8217;t take up space or anything (it&#8217;s all online). </p>
<p>So for this, I can&#8217;t see the reason to declutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tabs at Levnow</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19085</link>
		<dc:creator>Tabs at Levnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19085</guid>
		<description>I am a fan of the delete button too, but I tend to save emails for later then 100 pages with 100 emails each later I have to spend hours cleaning that stuff out.  I have a bad habit saving emails, so thanks for the post it is a reminder that I have to clean out all 20 of them.  :D And delete more oftent

-Tabs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a fan of the delete button too, but I tend to save emails for later then 100 pages with 100 emails each later I have to spend hours cleaning that stuff out.  I have a bad habit saving emails, so thanks for the post it is a reminder that I have to clean out all 20 of them.  <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  And delete more oftent</p>
<p>-Tabs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andamom</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19078</link>
		<dc:creator>Andamom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19078</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re like me, you receive 100+ legitimate emails at work. People do reference and ask me to access any number of these a few hours to a 1 or more after receipt. This is in addition to the project work and action items that I need to handle here. Further, our system is Lotus Notes. Periodically, I find a few minutes (like during an endless conference call) when I can start select mail to delete or archive -- but in general, I don&#039;t have the time to go back and sift through it all. Important messages and documents are sent to another location where all team members can access them at a future point. 

As a result, my work inbox is cluttered in a way that I would never accept in my home email or in the rest of my life. Give me an extra hour in my day, and I would use it for other purposes... although I agree in premise with what has been written.

*Note this message was written during lunch when I could be archiving but chose to eat and read unclutterer.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re like me, you receive 100+ legitimate emails at work. People do reference and ask me to access any number of these a few hours to a 1 or more after receipt. This is in addition to the project work and action items that I need to handle here. Further, our system is Lotus Notes. Periodically, I find a few minutes (like during an endless conference call) when I can start select mail to delete or archive &#8212; but in general, I don&#8217;t have the time to go back and sift through it all. Important messages and documents are sent to another location where all team members can access them at a future point. </p>
<p>As a result, my work inbox is cluttered in a way that I would never accept in my home email or in the rest of my life. Give me an extra hour in my day, and I would use it for other purposes&#8230; although I agree in premise with what has been written.</p>
<p>*Note this message was written during lunch when I could be archiving but chose to eat and read unclutterer.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fit Bottomed Girls</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/09/02/detox-your-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-19074</link>
		<dc:creator>Fit Bottomed Girls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=2074#comment-19074</guid>
		<description>The delete button is my favorite key...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The delete button is my favorite key&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
