<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unitasker Wednesday: The watch winder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:42:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-44060</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-44060</guid>
		<description>I agree with the previous comments. If you have a self-winding watch, you actually need something like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the previous comments. If you have a self-winding watch, you actually need something like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-40274</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-40274</guid>
		<description>I have a watch winder, and it would be more of a nuisance to change the time and deal with taking it into get repaired.  The watch winder gives me the option to wear different watches or not to wear one at all without worrying about my watch movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a watch winder, and it would be more of a nuisance to change the time and deal with taking it into get repaired.  The watch winder gives me the option to wear different watches or not to wear one at all without worrying about my watch movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lewis</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-40174</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-40174</guid>
		<description>Some have questioned why we need watches at all, especially these throwback mechanical ones. As an electronics and computer guy, I confess to a love of the beauty and precision of all those delicately orchestrated moving parts. As someone observed: mechanical watches have the unique quality of pathos: they&#039;re never going to be as accurate and trouble-free as a digital watch, but it&#039;s touching on some level to see them try SO HARD. 
For a fascinating story on the critical importance of accurate timekeeping for ocean navigation in a pre-electronic era, see the great book Longitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some have questioned why we need watches at all, especially these throwback mechanical ones. As an electronics and computer guy, I confess to a love of the beauty and precision of all those delicately orchestrated moving parts. As someone observed: mechanical watches have the unique quality of pathos: they&#8217;re never going to be as accurate and trouble-free as a digital watch, but it&#8217;s touching on some level to see them try SO HARD.<br />
For a fascinating story on the critical importance of accurate timekeeping for ocean navigation in a pre-electronic era, see the great book Longitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-33509</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-33509</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an amateur watchmaker, so I&#039;d like to weigh in on this unitasker.

Many posters here said that this is useful because keeping a watch would is necessary to maintain the delicate mechanical movement.  This is false.  The best way to keep a movement in good shape is to let it wind down and keep it some place cool and dry (and dark, to preserve the dial).  I have worked on 100 year old watches that still ran despite having sat in a shoebox for decades.   If the watch runs, it will wear down the parts--wear on the automatic winder is common and is related directly to how much the watch moves whether worn or in a winder.   As for the arguments that the oil needs to be moved around, that applies to cars, but not watches.  The volume of oil in a watch is miniscule and is kept in place by capillary action.  Movement neither helps nor hurts.

These winders are useful for &quot;complicated&quot; watches with things like perpetual calendars (they know the month and day) or moonphase.  They are hard to set, so keeping them running if you&#039;re not wearing them for a few days is very convenient.  

But using a winder will wear down the watch faster than letting it sit.

Andy-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an amateur watchmaker, so I&#8217;d like to weigh in on this unitasker.</p>
<p>Many posters here said that this is useful because keeping a watch would is necessary to maintain the delicate mechanical movement.  This is false.  The best way to keep a movement in good shape is to let it wind down and keep it some place cool and dry (and dark, to preserve the dial).  I have worked on 100 year old watches that still ran despite having sat in a shoebox for decades.   If the watch runs, it will wear down the parts&#8211;wear on the automatic winder is common and is related directly to how much the watch moves whether worn or in a winder.   As for the arguments that the oil needs to be moved around, that applies to cars, but not watches.  The volume of oil in a watch is miniscule and is kept in place by capillary action.  Movement neither helps nor hurts.</p>
<p>These winders are useful for &#8220;complicated&#8221; watches with things like perpetual calendars (they know the month and day) or moonphase.  They are hard to set, so keeping them running if you&#8217;re not wearing them for a few days is very convenient.  </p>
<p>But using a winder will wear down the watch faster than letting it sit.</p>
<p>Andy-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bobmore</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-18073</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bobmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-18073</guid>
		<description>Super Old Guy clearly doesn&#039;t have a fine watch. The stem does not wind the watch, it only sets the time. The only way to wind a watch like this is to wear it, or have a winder that simulates the motion of wearing it.

As for not wearing the watch enough to keep it wound, who would wear a $7K watch every day? Washing the dishes, mowing the lawn, etc. You don&#039;t wear a pearl necklace to aerobics class, right? Same idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super Old Guy clearly doesn&#8217;t have a fine watch. The stem does not wind the watch, it only sets the time. The only way to wind a watch like this is to wear it, or have a winder that simulates the motion of wearing it.</p>
<p>As for not wearing the watch enough to keep it wound, who would wear a $7K watch every day? Washing the dishes, mowing the lawn, etc. You don&#8217;t wear a pearl necklace to aerobics class, right? Same idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nakre</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-17197</link>
		<dc:creator>nakre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-17197</guid>
		<description>What an unnecessary piece if equipment, just as unnecessary as a wrist worn watch. Unclutter your life, buy a gold chain instead of an expensive watch to buy these silly man-toyz to show of in your &quot;sports room&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an unnecessary piece if equipment, just as unnecessary as a wrist worn watch. Unclutter your life, buy a gold chain instead of an expensive watch to buy these silly man-toyz to show of in your &#8220;sports room&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-17092</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-17092</guid>
		<description>@super old guy, It is not being lazy, it is being practical.  Those of us with many watches, especially those with multiple complications (perpetual calender, moon phases, etc) like to be able to pick out a watch at any time and wear it with out having to worry about having to set it correctly each time, remember most watches only have a power reserve of 2-3 days, which in the case of a number of complications can be very time consuming.  Add into the mix that not all automatic wind watches can be manually wound, a winder becomes essential.

Do I consider having multiple watches clutter, not really, all my watches get worn in rotation and depending on occasion and when you consider that all 12 can be stored in a display box that measures 356 x d: 210 x h: 86 mm and a winder 102 x dia: 102 x d: 140 mm.  Ok well maybe the winder takes up a little more space than I would like... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@super old guy, It is not being lazy, it is being practical.  Those of us with many watches, especially those with multiple complications (perpetual calender, moon phases, etc) like to be able to pick out a watch at any time and wear it with out having to worry about having to set it correctly each time, remember most watches only have a power reserve of 2-3 days, which in the case of a number of complications can be very time consuming.  Add into the mix that not all automatic wind watches can be manually wound, a winder becomes essential.</p>
<p>Do I consider having multiple watches clutter, not really, all my watches get worn in rotation and depending on occasion and when you consider that all 12 can be stored in a display box that measures 356 x d: 210 x h: 86 mm and a winder 102 x dia: 102 x d: 140 mm.  Ok well maybe the winder takes up a little more space than I would like&#8230; <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Old Guy</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-17039</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Old Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-17039</guid>
		<description>I bought one of these but my sundial wouldn&#039;t fit inside.

So you buy an expensive device to wind up an expensive watch that you can&#039;t be bothered to wear or take care of your self?

Unless you&#039;re missing both of your thumbs this is as useless as a watch you don&#039;t use.  &quot;I appreciate this fine timepiece so much that I can&#039;t be bothered to wind it up&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought one of these but my sundial wouldn&#8217;t fit inside.</p>
<p>So you buy an expensive device to wind up an expensive watch that you can&#8217;t be bothered to wear or take care of your self?</p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;re missing both of your thumbs this is as useless as a watch you don&#8217;t use.  &#8220;I appreciate this fine timepiece so much that I can&#8217;t be bothered to wind it up&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16993</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16993</guid>
		<description>I am a watch guy, but have limited my automatic watches (the ones wound by the body&#039;s motion) to two that I actually wear so that I don&#039;t have to get one of these winders, which do seem over the top. The watches do actually last longer, and need service left often if they are kept usually running to keep the oils from clumping up and separating as they do when not run often enough. 

I do have to chuckle though about how this looks to anyone outside watch geekdom. The display / winder is a bit much. And I certainly understand those of you who have decided to go without watches altogether.

In our digiital, throw-away age though, I do enjoy having a little remnant of the ingenuity that went into things that were built to last; that took real craftsmanship to create and that, properly maintained, can be passed on to your kids (like in pulp fiction)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a watch guy, but have limited my automatic watches (the ones wound by the body&#8217;s motion) to two that I actually wear so that I don&#8217;t have to get one of these winders, which do seem over the top. The watches do actually last longer, and need service left often if they are kept usually running to keep the oils from clumping up and separating as they do when not run often enough. </p>
<p>I do have to chuckle though about how this looks to anyone outside watch geekdom. The display / winder is a bit much. And I certainly understand those of you who have decided to go without watches altogether.</p>
<p>In our digiital, throw-away age though, I do enjoy having a little remnant of the ingenuity that went into things that were built to last; that took real craftsmanship to create and that, properly maintained, can be passed on to your kids (like in pulp fiction)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16960</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16960</guid>
		<description>@Erin Doland,  you are incorrect in your understanding of this product, it _is_ for winding automatic watches (it rotates the watch to keep the rotor moving) it does _not_ keep manual wind watches wound.  Wolf Designs only sell winders for Automatic watches.

Keeping a manual wind watch powered is much more complicated and the one* product (by orbita) that I am aware does this is many times more expensive

* http://www.orbita.ch/e_produkte_details.asp?id=5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Erin Doland,  you are incorrect in your understanding of this product, it _is_ for winding automatic watches (it rotates the watch to keep the rotor moving) it does _not_ keep manual wind watches wound.  Wolf Designs only sell winders for Automatic watches.</p>
<p>Keeping a manual wind watch powered is much more complicated and the one* product (by orbita) that I am aware does this is many times more expensive</p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.orbita.ch/e_produkte_details.asp?id=5" rel="nofollow">http://www.orbita.ch/e_produkte_details.asp?id=5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infmom</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16954</link>
		<dc:creator>infmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16954</guid>
		<description>@Daniel, depends on the watchmaker.  Ours is a brilliant lady who doesn&#039;t charge quite $100 yet.  But even if it were over $100, several of my watches are fine quality and it&#039;s worth every cent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel, depends on the watchmaker.  Ours is a brilliant lady who doesn&#8217;t charge quite $100 yet.  But even if it were over $100, several of my watches are fine quality and it&#8217;s worth every cent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16922</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16922</guid>
		<description>Mechanical watches will always be more expensive to run than a battery watch; it costs over a hundred dollars to properly overhaul them every 4 or 5 years. It&#039;s a good reason not to start.

Still, I&#039;d rather have a fine watch I can pass down to my kids than a disposable cell phone. :)

@infmom, watches usually advance the date if you wind the clock back and forth between 11pm and 1am. That should save on wear and tear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mechanical watches will always be more expensive to run than a battery watch; it costs over a hundred dollars to properly overhaul them every 4 or 5 years. It&#8217;s a good reason not to start.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;d rather have a fine watch I can pass down to my kids than a disposable cell phone. <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@infmom, watches usually advance the date if you wind the clock back and forth between 11pm and 1am. That should save on wear and tear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spark</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16917</link>
		<dc:creator>spark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16917</guid>
		<description>Oh, (sorry for posting twice) but I also miss the Extreme Minimalist Monday features.  I&#039;m with Mer on that, what happened to them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, (sorry for posting twice) but I also miss the Extreme Minimalist Monday features.  I&#8217;m with Mer on that, what happened to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spark</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16916</link>
		<dc:creator>spark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16916</guid>
		<description>Erin, 

This might help: 

http://www.watchcases.com/shop-for-winders-shop-by-brand-wolf-winders.html

&quot;The 2.0 Module simulates wearing a watch, allowing it to wind and unwind.&quot;

The one you have linked is apparently the 1.5 Module, but I&#039;m guessing it works in the same fashion.

Regardless of how it operates, it is certainly a unitasker.  

I don&#039;t understand why a person would own so many watches that he couldn&#039;t wear the same one enough to keep it wound in the first place.  That sounds like clutter for sure.  

But to each his own, I suppose.  We all seem to have some clutter somewhere in our lives that we could do without.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erin, </p>
<p>This might help: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.watchcases.com/shop-for-winders-shop-by-brand-wolf-winders.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.watchcases.com/shop.....nders.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The 2.0 Module simulates wearing a watch, allowing it to wind and unwind.&#8221;</p>
<p>The one you have linked is apparently the 1.5 Module, but I&#8217;m guessing it works in the same fashion.</p>
<p>Regardless of how it operates, it is certainly a unitasker.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why a person would own so many watches that he couldn&#8217;t wear the same one enough to keep it wound in the first place.  That sounds like clutter for sure.  </p>
<p>But to each his own, I suppose.  We all seem to have some clutter somewhere in our lives that we could do without.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16915</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16915</guid>
		<description>I think for most of us out there, this thing is just...odd.  I&#039;ve never heard of a watch winder, and can&#039;t imagine needing one.  Oh, and I do collect watches :)  I guess not the very expensive ones, however, that need their own watch winder case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for most of us out there, this thing is just&#8230;odd.  I&#8217;ve never heard of a watch winder, and can&#8217;t imagine needing one.  Oh, and I do collect watches <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I guess not the very expensive ones, however, that need their own watch winder case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16905</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16905</guid>
		<description>@Erin, the counterweight is inside each watch body. With manually wound watches, there are basically two types: the &quot;automatic&quot; ones (with the counterweight in the body), and hand-wound watches (wound by turning the crown - the little thing you pull out to adjust the time). This is for the former. I have never seen or heard of a device that will clamp and turn a watch crown. First, crowns are often unidirectional. Second, crowns frequently screw down or are recessed. Third, crowns aren&#039;t always in the same place.

Anyway, this thing turns back and forth. Only the round portion that holds the watch turns. Pretty standard design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Erin, the counterweight is inside each watch body. With manually wound watches, there are basically two types: the &#8220;automatic&#8221; ones (with the counterweight in the body), and hand-wound watches (wound by turning the crown &#8211; the little thing you pull out to adjust the time). This is for the former. I have never seen or heard of a device that will clamp and turn a watch crown. First, crowns are often unidirectional. Second, crowns frequently screw down or are recessed. Third, crowns aren&#8217;t always in the same place.</p>
<p>Anyway, this thing turns back and forth. Only the round portion that holds the watch turns. Pretty standard design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mer</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16904</link>
		<dc:creator>Mer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16904</guid>
		<description>What I wanna know is, what happened to Extreme Minimalist Monday???  I loved that feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I wanna know is, what happened to Extreme Minimalist Monday???  I loved that feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16902</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16902</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with many of the commenters here.  While I am a huge supporter, leader, and follower of the uncluttered lifestyle, I don&#039;t believe a watch winder is all that unreasonable.

I think that many of Unclutterer&#039;s fine readers would agree with me when I say that there&#039;s a big difference between a watch winder and items like the strawberry huller, the s&#039;more machine, and, my personal favorite, the spinning ice cream cone.

Watch winders are for watch lovers.  So, if a fine timepiece isn&#039;t your thing, I guess I could see why this would be a unitasker wednesday post.  In my personal opinion, a watch winder that keeps the movement constant in a fine, expensive timepiece is okay in my book.  A larger watch winder that keeps ten watches in movement? (btw, they do exist) Well, that&#039;s a bit much.  One very, very nice watch is something I am a supporter of.  Even if I could just check the time on a computer, my iPhone, or by asking someone on the street.

When the time comes that my personal finances are in check and I have all my ducks in order, I plan on purchasing a beautiful rose gold Panerai.  So you will, in fact, see one of these in my room...next to, in the spirit of everything Unclutterer, nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with many of the commenters here.  While I am a huge supporter, leader, and follower of the uncluttered lifestyle, I don&#8217;t believe a watch winder is all that unreasonable.</p>
<p>I think that many of Unclutterer&#8217;s fine readers would agree with me when I say that there&#8217;s a big difference between a watch winder and items like the strawberry huller, the s&#8217;more machine, and, my personal favorite, the spinning ice cream cone.</p>
<p>Watch winders are for watch lovers.  So, if a fine timepiece isn&#8217;t your thing, I guess I could see why this would be a unitasker wednesday post.  In my personal opinion, a watch winder that keeps the movement constant in a fine, expensive timepiece is okay in my book.  A larger watch winder that keeps ten watches in movement? (btw, they do exist) Well, that&#8217;s a bit much.  One very, very nice watch is something I am a supporter of.  Even if I could just check the time on a computer, my iPhone, or by asking someone on the street.</p>
<p>When the time comes that my personal finances are in check and I have all my ducks in order, I plan on purchasing a beautiful rose gold Panerai.  So you will, in fact, see one of these in my room&#8230;next to, in the spirit of everything Unclutterer, nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna Rocca</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna Rocca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16901</guid>
		<description>Some people have to have a watch winder if they have more than one watch.  Also it is nice to have something that is a &quot;unitaster&quot; also operate in one&#039;s decor, so it might as well be pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people have to have a watch winder if they have more than one watch.  Also it is nice to have something that is a &#8220;unitaster&#8221; also operate in one&#8217;s decor, so it might as well be pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: consumer_q</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/07/30/unitasker-wednesday-the-watch-winder/comment-page-1/#comment-16895</link>
		<dc:creator>consumer_q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/?p=1562#comment-16895</guid>
		<description>I keep these on top of my wine refrigerator. ;-)

Really though, as other people have mentioned, if you are a collector then these are required (kinda like a wine refrigerator).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep these on top of my wine refrigerator. <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Really though, as other people have mentioned, if you are a collector then these are required (kinda like a wine refrigerator).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
