<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless iPod streaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:44:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-39415</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/#comment-39415</guid>
		<description>I just bought it so I could change the music on ipod while laying by the pool. The range is not great. If you move it you get a lot of static. If you pick it up to change the music you get static. The product needs work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought it so I could change the music on ipod while laying by the pool. The range is not great. If you move it you get a lot of static. If you pick it up to change the music you get static. The product needs work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Addison</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-10950</link>
		<dc:creator>D Addison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/#comment-10950</guid>
		<description>This is oooll for the price but I currently running my iPod through a sound system using a standard audio cable connected to a &quot;direct box&quot; on stage. It works but very limited for me to DJ through my Ipod however I trip over the cable while moving around the stage. Any thoughts on making an iPod connection truely wireless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is oooll for the price but I currently running my iPod through a sound system using a standard audio cable connected to a &#8220;direct box&#8221; on stage. It works but very limited for me to DJ through my Ipod however I trip over the cable while moving around the stage. Any thoughts on making an iPod connection truely wireless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Owens</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 05:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>If you have a iPhone or iPod Touch, and a computer is close to your stereo, Remote Buddy (http://www.iospirit.com/) is an amazingly slick solution. (Not paid, just impressed by their product)

I agree that this wireless transmitter is a step in the wrong direction. I&#039;m also amused by the marketing slant, that you get to use familiar iPod controls to control your stereo, when actually you&#039;re just controlling the iPod as usual. Not to be discouraging though, it looks like a decent product and I&#039;m sure that there are plenty of people that could solve some problems with it. It should really be about $30 (at the most) instead of $100 though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a iPhone or iPod Touch, and a computer is close to your stereo, Remote Buddy (<a href="http://www.iospirit.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.iospirit.com/</a>) is an amazingly slick solution. (Not paid, just impressed by their product)</p>
<p>I agree that this wireless transmitter is a step in the wrong direction. I&#8217;m also amused by the marketing slant, that you get to use familiar iPod controls to control your stereo, when actually you&#8217;re just controlling the iPod as usual. Not to be discouraging though, it looks like a decent product and I&#8217;m sure that there are plenty of people that could solve some problems with it. It should really be about $30 (at the most) instead of $100 though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-9578</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/#comment-9578</guid>
		<description>how about streaming from your computer, AND using your WiFi-enabled iPod as a remote!

of, course, someone would need to build the widget....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about streaming from your computer, AND using your WiFi-enabled iPod as a remote!</p>
<p>of, course, someone would need to build the widget&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-9523</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/#comment-9523</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree, this is more clutter not less.  A y cable works better, preserving the what little sound quality your ipod has.  The wireless device is just another   plug to worry about.

Streaming from you computer would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree, this is more clutter not less.  A y cable works better, preserving the what little sound quality your ipod has.  The wireless device is just another   plug to worry about.</p>
<p>Streaming from you computer would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-9498</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclutterer.com/2008/03/20/wireless-ipod-streaming/#comment-9498</guid>
		<description>This device, while cool, does not do anything to help with cable clutter. Instead of getting rid of that cable you presently plug in to your ipod, you&#039;re just swapping it out for another cable with a bigger thing on the end of it.  And the base-station/receiving unit probably has its own power brick that goes with it.  So now you&#039;ve got one extra cable and a power brick.  Then there&#039;s the transmitter piece that clips on to the bottom of the ipod. That&#039;s another piece of kit to keep track of and lose or misplace...and you have to remember to take it off your ipod and put it back with the base unit when you leave the house with your player.

Sure, it&#039;s a cool thing with some interesting functionality, but for $100 you&#039;re increasing clutter and complexity more than you&#039;re decreasing it.

--M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This device, while cool, does not do anything to help with cable clutter. Instead of getting rid of that cable you presently plug in to your ipod, you&#8217;re just swapping it out for another cable with a bigger thing on the end of it.  And the base-station/receiving unit probably has its own power brick that goes with it.  So now you&#8217;ve got one extra cable and a power brick.  Then there&#8217;s the transmitter piece that clips on to the bottom of the ipod. That&#8217;s another piece of kit to keep track of and lose or misplace&#8230;and you have to remember to take it off your ipod and put it back with the base unit when you leave the house with your player.</p>
<p>Sure, it&#8217;s a cool thing with some interesting functionality, but for $100 you&#8217;re increasing clutter and complexity more than you&#8217;re decreasing it.</p>
<p>&#8211;M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

