<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An alternative to a bulky double boiler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:04:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>This doesn&#039;t make much sense to me. Silicone works great for baking but as a double boiler? Unlike metal which conducts, silicone is heavy insulating material. Wouldn&#039;t you have to heat the water way past just boiling point to make this work? It seems like you&#039;d lose a lot of heating control by switching to silicone. Since the whole point of using a double boiler is controlled, stable heat, you&#039;d be taking a huge sacrifice for some collapsibility.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t make much sense to me. Silicone works great for baking but as a double boiler? Unlike metal which conducts, silicone is heavy insulating material. Wouldn&#8217;t you have to heat the water way past just boiling point to make this work? It seems like you&#8217;d lose a lot of heating control by switching to silicone. Since the whole point of using a double boiler is controlled, stable heat, you&#8217;d be taking a huge sacrifice for some collapsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>I just put chocolate chips in the microwave for 15-30 seconds at a time and stir--no burning, no boiling, no drama, just yummy meltedness.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just put chocolate chips in the microwave for 15-30 seconds at a time and stir&#8211;no burning, no boiling, no drama, just yummy meltedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K1rk</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>K1rk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>Death to the unitasker! Long live the ubiquitous...bowl!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Death to the unitasker! Long live the ubiquitous&#8230;bowl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>just having a laugh as I come back from your &#039;nice sites&#039; ... Paperclippy - its cute but so, so very cluttery! :)

I&#039;m a bit suspicious about all this silicone stuff. Sticking with my stainless steel. There&#039;s also the aesthetic element - entirely absent from this object.

Enjoying the blog though!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just having a laugh as I come back from your &#8216;nice sites&#8217; &#8230; Paperclippy &#8211; its cute but so, so very cluttery! <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit suspicious about all this silicone stuff. Sticking with my stainless steel. There&#8217;s also the aesthetic element &#8211; entirely absent from this object.</p>
<p>Enjoying the blog though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>I always just use a pan on low heat.  Experts agree that this is a recipe for burning, but I just stir continuously and don&#039;t have a problem.  I think the only thing I make that should be done with a double boiler is melting chocolate, though.  I haven&#039;t tried making Hollandaise sauce or anything.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always just use a pan on low heat.  Experts agree that this is a recipe for burning, but I just stir continuously and don&#8217;t have a problem.  I think the only thing I make that should be done with a double boiler is melting chocolate, though.  I haven&#8217;t tried making Hollandaise sauce or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin at Unclutterer</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin at Unclutterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>This could easily be used as a bowl, too, so I wouldn&#039;t say that it&#039;s a unitasker. Since it&#039;s collapsible, it also takes up a lot less space than a traditional bowl.

@Ben--I&#039;ve had personal experience with pyrex bowls exploding and don&#039;t recommend using them in a double boiler situation. The stainless/aluminum bowls work fine, though, like you suggested.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could easily be used as a bowl, too, so I wouldn&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s a unitasker. Since it&#8217;s collapsible, it also takes up a lot less space than a traditional bowl.</p>
<p>@Ben&#8211;I&#8217;ve had personal experience with pyrex bowls exploding and don&#8217;t recommend using them in a double boiler situation. The stainless/aluminum bowls work fine, though, like you suggested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>Seriously. Bowl over heat.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously. Bowl over heat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angorian</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>angorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>I just use a metal bowl on top of a pot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use a metal bowl on top of a pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>This is clutter. Use a stainless or pyrex bowl on top of a pot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is clutter. Use a stainless or pyrex bowl on top of a pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>Your link to Amazon does not have any user reviews.    Could you add  yours?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link to Amazon does not have any user reviews.    Could you add  yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Racine</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Racine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2760</guid>
		<description>You can also just use a stainless steel bowl.  Alton Brown describes it.  It needs to fit on your pan with a few inches to spare (for the water and clearance) and deep rather than shallow is better.

So - no clutter!  Because the bowl and pan are separately useful.

Actually, Alton Brown says the only uni-tasker in your kitchen should be your fire extinguisher.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also just use a stainless steel bowl.  Alton Brown describes it.  It needs to fit on your pan with a few inches to spare (for the water and clearance) and deep rather than shallow is better.</p>
<p>So &#8211; no clutter!  Because the bowl and pan are separately useful.</p>
<p>Actually, Alton Brown says the only uni-tasker in your kitchen should be your fire extinguisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin at Unclutterer</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin at Unclutterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>Matt--Feel welcome to drop some of those holiday cookies in the mail ... :)

I really like the &lt;em&gt;idea&lt;/em&gt; of this. I&#039;m wondering how well it will work in execution. I&#039;m seeing that it would be great for melting chocolate. Interesting ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt&#8211;Feel welcome to drop some of those holiday cookies in the mail &#8230; <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I really like the <em>idea</em> of this. I&#8217;m wondering how well it will work in execution. I&#8217;m seeing that it would be great for melting chocolate. Interesting &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
