<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An alternative to a bulky double boiler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>This doesn't make much sense to me. Silicone works great for baking but as a double boiler? Unlike metal which conducts, silicone is heavy insulating material. Wouldn't you have to heat the water way past just boiling point to make this work? It seems like you'd lose a lot of heating control by switching to silicone. Since the whole point of using a double boiler is controlled, stable heat, you'd be taking a huge sacrifice for some collapsibility.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t make much sense to me. Silicone works great for baking but as a double boiler? Unlike metal which conducts, silicone is heavy insulating material. Wouldn&#8217;t you have to heat the water way past just boiling point to make this work? It seems like you&#8217;d lose a lot of heating control by switching to silicone. Since the whole point of using a double boiler is controlled, stable heat, you&#8217;d be taking a huge sacrifice for some collapsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>I just put chocolate chips in the microwave for 15-30 seconds at a time and stir--no burning, no boiling, no drama, just yummy meltedness.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just put chocolate chips in the microwave for 15-30 seconds at a time and stir&#8211;no burning, no boiling, no drama, just yummy meltedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K1rk</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>K1rk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>Death to the unitasker! Long live the ubiquitous...bowl!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Death to the unitasker! Long live the ubiquitous&#8230;bowl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>just having a laugh as I come back from your 'nice sites' ... Paperclippy - its cute but so, so very cluttery! :)

I'm a bit suspicious about all this silicone stuff. Sticking with my stainless steel. There's also the aesthetic element - entirely absent from this object.

Enjoying the blog though!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just having a laugh as I come back from your &#8216;nice sites&#8217; &#8230; Paperclippy - its cute but so, so very cluttery! <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I&#8217;m a bit suspicious about all this silicone stuff. Sticking with my stainless steel. There&#8217;s also the aesthetic element - entirely absent from this object.</p>
<p>Enjoying the blog though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>I always just use a pan on low heat.  Experts agree that this is a recipe for burning, but I just stir continuously and don't have a problem.  I think the only thing I make that should be done with a double boiler is melting chocolate, though.  I haven't tried making Hollandaise sauce or anything.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always just use a pan on low heat.  Experts agree that this is a recipe for burning, but I just stir continuously and don&#8217;t have a problem.  I think the only thing I make that should be done with a double boiler is melting chocolate, though.  I haven&#8217;t tried making Hollandaise sauce or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin at Unclutterer</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin at Unclutterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>This could easily be used as a bowl, too, so I wouldn't say that it's a unitasker. Since it's collapsible, it also takes up a lot less space than a traditional bowl.

@Ben--I've had personal experience with pyrex bowls exploding and don't recommend using them in a double boiler situation. The stainless/aluminum bowls work fine, though, like you suggested.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could easily be used as a bowl, too, so I wouldn&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s a unitasker. Since it&#8217;s collapsible, it also takes up a lot less space than a traditional bowl.</p>
<p>@Ben&#8211;I&#8217;ve had personal experience with pyrex bowls exploding and don&#8217;t recommend using them in a double boiler situation. The stainless/aluminum bowls work fine, though, like you suggested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>Seriously. Bowl over heat.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously. Bowl over heat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angorian</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>angorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>I just use a metal bowl on top of a pot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use a metal bowl on top of a pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>This is clutter. Use a stainless or pyrex bowl on top of a pot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is clutter. Use a stainless or pyrex bowl on top of a pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>Your link to Amazon does not have any user reviews.    Could you add  yours?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link to Amazon does not have any user reviews.    Could you add  yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Racine</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Racine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2760</guid>
		<description>You can also just use a stainless steel bowl.  Alton Brown describes it.  It needs to fit on your pan with a few inches to spare (for the water and clearance) and deep rather than shallow is better.

So - no clutter!  Because the bowl and pan are separately useful.

Actually, Alton Brown says the only uni-tasker in your kitchen should be your fire extinguisher.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also just use a stainless steel bowl.  Alton Brown describes it.  It needs to fit on your pan with a few inches to spare (for the water and clearance) and deep rather than shallow is better.</p>
<p>So - no clutter!  Because the bowl and pan are separately useful.</p>
<p>Actually, Alton Brown says the only uni-tasker in your kitchen should be your fire extinguisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin at Unclutterer</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin at Unclutterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/08/26/an-alternative-to-a-bulky-double-boiler/#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>Matt--Feel welcome to drop some of those holiday cookies in the mail ... :)

I really like the &lt;em&gt;idea&lt;/em&gt; of this. I'm wondering how well it will work in execution. I'm seeing that it would be great for melting chocolate. Interesting ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt&#8211;Feel welcome to drop some of those holiday cookies in the mail &#8230; <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I really like the <em>idea</em> of this. I&#8217;m wondering how well it will work in execution. I&#8217;m seeing that it would be great for melting chocolate. Interesting &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
