Comments on: Stowaway cookware can save space in the kitchen

By: Josh

Josh — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 01:06:54 +0000

I remember the old TFal pots with removable handles. They were great . . . until they quickly wore out and stopped gripping the edge of the pots.

By: Katie

Katie — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:53:26 +0000

I agree with jazzle – the pot you need is always on bottom requiring you to get everything out just to get the one you need.

In our last apartments we had a heavy duty wire on the wall with hooks that held up the pans. It was so convenient – easy to get out, easy to put away. We plan to put together a similar setup in our new place.

By: Peter

Peter — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:22:06 +0000

TFal came out with a similar set as the Fagor posted by Felis. The nice part was the plastic covers that you can use on the pots after they cool for leftovers. I don’t think it’s available anymore but, if you can find it it was called Ingenio.

The non-stick part is great!!!

By: Felis

Felis — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:12:29 +0000

I like this set myself, the handles are super super easy to clip and unclip... and the non-stick pan is great. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00023D9SK/unclutterer-20/ref=nosim/

By: Red

Red — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:16:36 +0000

(IMO = In my opinion)

In my house, we end up stacking anything anyway, but it’s always falling over. If I’m going to be stacking, I’d rather it all fit together nicely and not topple over on me every time I open the cabinet. I think this is a pretty cool idea.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:42:48 +0000

what does imo mean?

By: jazzle

jazzle — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:29:15 +0000

Stackable cookware is just a pain imo, you always need to use the one that’s hardest to get to.