<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audiophiles and CD clutter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on how to organize your home and office.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>A little late to the party, but I've been using storage boxes from Ikea along with CD sleeves (originally Case Logic, but I switched to the cheaper ones from Staples).  That way, anything that isn't in a digipak takes up a hell of a lot less space, which helps when your collection's pushing 2,000 CD's; the boxes I use are only supposed to hold about 25 CD's, but I fit almost 75 discs in each one (assuming they're all in sleeves, and the digipak CD's fit neatly in the space along the side).

Also, another big help as far as clutter?  If you're not going to listen to a CD, get rid of it.  I went through my collection, tossing the ones I had no intention on listening to (even though I've ripped them all already) and purged almost a quarter of the CD's.  (They're all up for sale, which should help recoup some money I wouldn't otherwise have.)

Alas and alack, I haven't found much of a use for the jewel cases.  I unloaded most of them on thrift stores, but I think one of the employees said they throw out the empty cases.  Ah well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little late to the party, but I&#8217;ve been using storage boxes from Ikea along with CD sleeves (originally Case Logic, but I switched to the cheaper ones from Staples).  That way, anything that isn&#8217;t in a digipak takes up a hell of a lot less space, which helps when your collection&#8217;s pushing 2,000 CD&#8217;s; the boxes I use are only supposed to hold about 25 CD&#8217;s, but I fit almost 75 discs in each one (assuming they&#8217;re all in sleeves, and the digipak CD&#8217;s fit neatly in the space along the side).</p>
<p>Also, another big help as far as clutter?  If you&#8217;re not going to listen to a CD, get rid of it.  I went through my collection, tossing the ones I had no intention on listening to (even though I&#8217;ve ripped them all already) and purged almost a quarter of the CD&#8217;s.  (They&#8217;re all up for sale, which should help recoup some money I wouldn&#8217;t otherwise have.)</p>
<p>Alas and alack, I haven&#8217;t found much of a use for the jewel cases.  I unloaded most of them on thrift stores, but I think one of the employees said they throw out the empty cases.  Ah well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 23:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>You might also consider the Sonos Digital Music System (http://www.sonos.com) for a system that is easier to setup than Squeezebox. It was reviewed in Stereophile (http://www.stereophile.com/news/062606sonos/) and also by David Pogue for the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/20/technology/20pogue.html)

For simple, true multi-room audio, it's hard to beat!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might also consider the Sonos Digital Music System (http://www.sonos.com) for a system that is easier to setup than Squeezebox. It was reviewed in Stereophile (http://www.stereophile.com/news/062606sonos/) and also by David Pogue for the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/20/technology/20pogue.html)</p>
<p>For simple, true multi-room audio, it&#8217;s hard to beat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunspot</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunspot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There is something to be said for keeping the physical CD - the artwork that comes with the CD, if nothing else. And for those of us who do still collect music physically, putting those CDs in lidded boxes that stack - your only proposed solution - will not give any sort of easy access to the music.&lt;/i&gt;

I ripped my 500 CD library to my computer almost 5 years ago and now seldom if ever even look at the actual physical CDs.  Most of the tiny booklets that come with CDs are a joke - you can find out far more about most discs online, at Wikipedia or Amazon, than the labels themselves ever got around to telling us.  You can even view larger representations of the artwork.

I store my CDs at the back of the closet.  One of these days I'll work up the energy to pluck the disc themselves out of their jewel boxes, along with the booklets and possibly the back cover art, and file the whole mess away in a drawer somewhere.

Physical media is so over.

Oh, and totally go with a lossless format.  Hard drive space is cheap.  Re-ripping is time consuming, especially if you correct all the crap metadata you'll get off the net.  MediaMonkey allows you to create a synchronized copy of your library in another format.  I ripped my library to FLAC, then I used MediaMonkey to create a synchronized copy as 256kpbs mp3 files for use on my iPod in my car.  The next version of MediaMonkey is slated to support AAC compression, so at some point I'll probably create a synced library of 192kpbs AAC files for use on both the car iPod and my iPod Shuffle.  Having those original lossless files means never having to be stuck with just one lossy format.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is something to be said for keeping the physical CD - the artwork that comes with the CD, if nothing else. And for those of us who do still collect music physically, putting those CDs in lidded boxes that stack - your only proposed solution - will not give any sort of easy access to the music.</i></p>
<p>I ripped my 500 CD library to my computer almost 5 years ago and now seldom if ever even look at the actual physical CDs.  Most of the tiny booklets that come with CDs are a joke - you can find out far more about most discs online, at Wikipedia or Amazon, than the labels themselves ever got around to telling us.  You can even view larger representations of the artwork.</p>
<p>I store my CDs at the back of the closet.  One of these days I&#8217;ll work up the energy to pluck the disc themselves out of their jewel boxes, along with the booklets and possibly the back cover art, and file the whole mess away in a drawer somewhere.</p>
<p>Physical media is so over.</p>
<p>Oh, and totally go with a lossless format.  Hard drive space is cheap.  Re-ripping is time consuming, especially if you correct all the crap metadata you&#8217;ll get off the net.  MediaMonkey allows you to create a synchronized copy of your library in another format.  I ripped my library to FLAC, then I used MediaMonkey to create a synchronized copy as 256kpbs mp3 files for use on my iPod in my car.  The next version of MediaMonkey is slated to support AAC compression, so at some point I&#8217;ll probably create a synced library of 192kpbs AAC files for use on both the car iPod and my iPod Shuffle.  Having those original lossless files means never having to be stuck with just one lossy format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 22:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-399</guid>
		<description>I am all for getting rid of clutter, and I am an audiophile, but I just don't consider CDs to be clutter. I like having shelves full of organized music. Clutter is a mess. If your CDs are organized, it isn't clutter.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for getting rid of clutter, and I am an audiophile, but I just don&#8217;t consider CDs to be clutter. I like having shelves full of organized music. Clutter is a mess. If your CDs are organized, it isn&#8217;t clutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>It'll be good if those discarded or to-be-discarded CD cases can be put to other good use, otherwise many times we unclutter at the expanse of contributing to more waste...this cycle does not seem to end.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be good if those discarded or to-be-discarded CD cases can be put to other good use, otherwise many times we unclutter at the expanse of contributing to more waste&#8230;this cycle does not seem to end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 06:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>'unobtainium-plated interconnects sheathed in endangered panda skin for optimum voodoo-shielding'

Thanks for that... I have feared that this blog was a little too serious for its own good, but this restores my faith!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;unobtainium-plated interconnects sheathed in endangered panda skin for optimum voodoo-shielding&#8217;</p>
<p>Thanks for that&#8230; I have feared that this blog was a little too serious for its own good, but this restores my faith!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kort</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Kort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 23:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>As an audiophile myself with roughly 1,000 CDs I made a tough decision this year. I got rid of all of the packaging. The jewel cases were so heavy they ripped through the garbage bags I was bringing them out with. Jewel cases are ridiculously bulky! I kept thinking as I was taking them out how happy I was to have gotten rid of all of that crap. Honestly, if you are a true audiophile then the music itself is the most important part of your collection. I kept all of the front booklets from the CDs, but since I have yet to want or need to look back at them I am guessing I'll soon part with those as well. As for the CDs themselves, I alphabetized them in the same way that iTunes/iPods do and they reside in rolling case designed for DJs. I'm so happy that I decided to declutter in this way and I find it so easy to locate a CD I'm looking for now. Do this or something similar, you won't regret it!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an audiophile myself with roughly 1,000 CDs I made a tough decision this year. I got rid of all of the packaging. The jewel cases were so heavy they ripped through the garbage bags I was bringing them out with. Jewel cases are ridiculously bulky! I kept thinking as I was taking them out how happy I was to have gotten rid of all of that crap. Honestly, if you are a true audiophile then the music itself is the most important part of your collection. I kept all of the front booklets from the CDs, but since I have yet to want or need to look back at them I am guessing I&#8217;ll soon part with those as well. As for the CDs themselves, I alphabetized them in the same way that iTunes/iPods do and they reside in rolling case designed for DJs. I&#8217;m so happy that I decided to declutter in this way and I find it so easy to locate a CD I&#8217;m looking for now. Do this or something similar, you won&#8217;t regret it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k2</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>k2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>good thing you linked this on digg then, so people can catch up.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good thing you linked this on digg then, so people can catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever said it was a radically new approach to music management. The reader asked for a good solution for dealing with the clutter caused by a large music collection. That's what we presented.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever said it was a radically new approach to music management. The reader asked for a good solution for dealing with the clutter caused by a large music collection. That&#8217;s what we presented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k2</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>k2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>5 years ago called, said the idea isn't new.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 years ago called, said the idea isn&#8217;t new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 20:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>If the experience of the CD packaging is really important to you, then nice shelving is probably your best bet. Last week's post about this had some good options regarding different types of replacement jewel cases that take up less room.

Although, you could always go the ReadyNAS route in addition to shelving, and create less clutter by not having to open every CD every time you want to listen to it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the experience of the CD packaging is really important to you, then nice shelving is probably your best bet. Last week&#8217;s post about this had some good options regarding different types of replacement jewel cases that take up less room.</p>
<p>Although, you could always go the ReadyNAS route in addition to shelving, and create less clutter by not having to open every CD every time you want to listen to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zed</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>I was so excited when I read the reader's question, because I too have many CDs (probably more like 800) and I've wanted to invest in a good CD cabinet, but have never quite found one that would hold enough.

I understand the argument to go digital, certainly - but I've gatta say, this answer really didn't address the problem. There is something to be said for keeping the physical CD - the artwork that comes with the CD, if nothing else. And for those of us who do still collect music physically, putting those CDs in lidded boxes that stack - your only proposed solution - will not give any sort of easy access to the music. The boxes would also make it difficult to arrange CDs alphabetically, for example, because each box has small cubbies that hold (it appears?) 10-15 CDs each, and every box would have to be rearranged when a new CD is added.

Any other solutions, that actually address the question? I'd be curious to know.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was so excited when I read the reader&#8217;s question, because I too have many CDs (probably more like 800) and I&#8217;ve wanted to invest in a good CD cabinet, but have never quite found one that would hold enough.</p>
<p>I understand the argument to go digital, certainly - but I&#8217;ve gatta say, this answer really didn&#8217;t address the problem. There is something to be said for keeping the physical CD - the artwork that comes with the CD, if nothing else. And for those of us who do still collect music physically, putting those CDs in lidded boxes that stack - your only proposed solution - will not give any sort of easy access to the music. The boxes would also make it difficult to arrange CDs alphabetically, for example, because each box has small cubbies that hold (it appears?) 10-15 CDs each, and every box would have to be rearranged when a new CD is added.</p>
<p>Any other solutions, that actually address the question? I&#8217;d be curious to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Zeratsky</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>John Zeratsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>PJ -- Good point about transcoding. I probably erred on the side of compatibility at the expense of quality and longevity. Oh well... if it really bothered me I would've ripped everything to AIFF :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ &#8212; Good point about transcoding. I probably erred on the side of compatibility at the expense of quality and longevity. Oh well&#8230; if it really bothered me I would&#8217;ve ripped everything to AIFF <img src='http://unclutterer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Steinbaugh</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Steinbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>If you have a PC, I highly recommend using dBpoweramp to rip your CDs to Apple Lossless. It supports AccurateRip and uses the allmedia (AMG) guide for metadata, including the UPC of each CD. The program also supports secure extraction like EAC but can rip directly to ALAC or FLAC.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a PC, I highly recommend using dBpoweramp to rip your CDs to Apple Lossless. It supports AccurateRip and uses the allmedia (AMG) guide for metadata, including the UPC of each CD. The program also supports secure extraction like EAC but can rip directly to ALAC or FLAC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Torres</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Torres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Great write-up.  I do much of the same except I use a 2TB Iomega StorCenter NAS and rip to WMA Lossless.  I actually dual-rip to MP3 for those tracks I want to get onto my iPod, but otherwise WMA Lossless works great.

I would recommend the Xbox 360 as a *fantastic* streaming solution for folks.  It works like a charm with PCs and Macs and it's a lot more functional and useful than Apple TV (you can download movies directly, play games, etc.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write-up.  I do much of the same except I use a 2TB Iomega StorCenter NAS and rip to WMA Lossless.  I actually dual-rip to MP3 for those tracks I want to get onto my iPod, but otherwise WMA Lossless works great.</p>
<p>I would recommend the Xbox 360 as a *fantastic* streaming solution for folks.  It works like a charm with PCs and Macs and it&#8217;s a lot more functional and useful than Apple TV (you can download movies directly, play games, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Doland</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>I probably couldn't hear the difference myself, but going lossless means I'll never have to worry about changing my mind. I also know that I'll be able to convert to another lossless codec in the future without suffering the degradation that accompanies transcoding.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably couldn&#8217;t hear the difference myself, but going lossless means I&#8217;ll never have to worry about changing my mind. I also know that I&#8217;ll be able to convert to another lossless codec in the future without suffering the degradation that accompanies transcoding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Zeratsky</title>
		<link>http://unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>John Zeratsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://development.unclutterer.com/2007/05/15/audiophiles-and-cd-clutter/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Great post! I just went through this myself...

I have a very similar setup -- iTunes, ReadyNAS, Apple TV, Toslink to Cambridge 540, Usher V-602s. Only difference is that I rip everything to 320kbps MP3 instead of Apple Lossless. The aural differences are imperceptible to my ears and MP3 is much more widely supported than ALAC.

I don't call myself an audiophile, but I'm very discerning and I couldn't be (much) happier with my system.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! I just went through this myself&#8230;</p>
<p>I have a very similar setup &#8212; iTunes, ReadyNAS, Apple TV, Toslink to Cambridge 540, Usher V-602s. Only difference is that I rip everything to 320kbps MP3 instead of Apple Lossless. The aural differences are imperceptible to my ears and MP3 is much more widely supported than ALAC.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t call myself an audiophile, but I&#8217;m very discerning and I couldn&#8217;t be (much) happier with my system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
